Law and Forensic Science, Volume 15 (2018/1), pages 45-59.
Submitted: April 18, 2018. Published: June 16, 2018.
The author declares there is no conflict of interest.
Abstract: This article examines the issue of criminal liability in terms of the theoretical distinction between justification and excuse. By contrast with German and other Continental criminal law systems, the distinction has not played a significant part in the development of criminal law doctrine in common law jurisdictions. Over the past few decades, however, there has been a growing interest in the benefits of this approach to conceptualising criminal liability, as manifested by the considerable literature on justification and excuse and the frequent references to the distinction in judicial decisions, legislative enactments and scholarly works. Although the distinction has been given a great deal of attention in common law countries in recent years, attempts at a systematic classification of criminal law defences on this basis run up against serious difficulties. These difficulties have much to do with the fact that elements of both justification and excuse often appear to overlap in the moral and conceptual basis of a legal defence. It is argued that, notwithstanding these difficulties, the theory of justification and excuse offers a viable model, which can achieve and maintain a measure of coherence among criminal law defences and facilitate understanding and acceptance of the criminal law system and its presuppositions. The references to German criminal law theory add a useful comparative perspective to the discussion of the issues.
Keywords: harm, culpability, criminal liability, justification, excuse, defences
Achenbach, H. (1974). Historische und dogmatische Grundlagen der strafrechtssystematischen Schuldlehre. Berlin: Schweizer.
Alldridge, P. (1983). “The Coherence of Defences”. Criminal Law Review 665.
Allen, H. (1988). “One Law for All Reasonable Persons?” 16 International Journal of Sociology of Law 419.
Ashworth, A. (1975). “Self-Defence and the Right to Life”. 34 Cambridge Law Journal 282.
Bacon, Francis (1630 repr. 2003). The Elements of the Common Lawes of England. Union, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange.
Baron, M. (2005). “Justifications and Excuses”. 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 387.
Bayles, M. (1982). “Character, Purpose and Criminal Responsibility”. 1 Law and Philosophy 5.
Beling, E. (1906). Die lehre vom verbrechen. Tübingen: Mohr.
Berman, M. N. (2003). “Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality”. 53(1) Duke Law Journal 1.
Binding, K. (1872). Die Normen und ihre Übertretung. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Brudner, A. (1987). “A Theory of Necessity”. 7 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 339.
Coke, Edward (1660). The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. London: Printed by J. Flesher for W. Lee and D. Pakeman.
Colvin. E. (1991). Principles of Criminal Law (2nd edition). Toronto: Carswell.
Corrado, M. L. (ed) (1994). Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
Dalton, Michael (1619 repr. 1973). Countrey Justice. London: Professional Books.
Dressler, J. (1982). “Rethinking Heat of Passion: A Defence in Search of a Rationale”. 73 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 421.
Dressler, J. (1984). “New Thoughts about the Concept of Justification in the Criminal Law: A Critique of Fletcher’s Thinking and Rethinking”. 32 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 61.
Dressler, J. (1987). “Justifications and Excuses: A Brief Review of the Concepts and the Literature”. 33 Wayne Law Review 1155.
Dressler, J. (1988A). “Reflections on Excusing Wrongdoers: Moral Theory, New Excuses and the Model Penal Code”. 19 Rutgers Law Journal 671.
Dressler, J. (1988B). “Provocation: Partial Justification or Partial Excuse?” 51 Modern Law Review 467.
Eser A. (1976). “Justification and Excuse”. 24 American Journal of Comparative Law 621.
Eser, A. (1987). “Justification and Excuse: A Key Issue in the Concept of Crime”. In
Eser et al. (eds), Justification and Excuse: Comparative Perspectives, vol. 1.
Dobbs Ferry, New York: Transnational Juris Publications.
Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and Deserving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fletcher, G. (1974). “The Individualization of Excusing Conditions”. 47 Southern California Law Review 1269.
Fletcher, G. (1975). “The Right Deed for the Wrong Reason: A Reply to Mr Robinson”. 23 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 293. Reprinted in M. L. Corrado (ed) (1994), Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
Fletcher, G. (1978). Rethinking Criminal Law. Boston & Toronto: Little, Brown & Co.
Fletcher, G. (1979). “The Right to Life”. 13 Georgia Law Review 1371.
Fletcher, G. (1985). “The Right and the Reasonable”. 98 Harvard Law Review 949.
Foster, M. (1762). Crown Cases. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Frank, R. (1907). Über den aufbau des schuldbegriffs. Giessen: Toepelmann.
Frank, R. (1931). Das Strafgesetzbuch für das Deutsche Reich(18th edition). Goldbach: Keip.
Funk, T. M. (1999). “Justifying Justifications”. 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 631.
Goldschmidt, J. (1930). “Normativer Schuldbegriff”. 1 Festgabe fur R. v. Frank 428. Tübingen: Mohr.
Goldschmidt, J. (1913). “Der Notstand, ein Schuldproblem”. 4 Osterr. Zeitschrift fur Strafrecht 144.
Green, T.A. (1972). “Societal Concepts of Criminal Liability in Medieval England”. 47 Speculum 669.
Green, T.A. (1976). “The Jury and the English Law of Homicide, 1200-1600”. 74 Michigan Law Review 413.
Greenawalt, K.(1984). “The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse”. 84 Columbia Law Review 1897.
Greenawalt, K. (1986). “Distinguishing Justifications from Excuses”. 49 Law and Contemporary Problems 89.
Gur-Arye, M. (1986). “Should the Criminal Law Distinguish Between Necessity as a Justification and Necessity as an Excuse?”. 102 Law Quarterly Review 71.
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). “Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment”. In Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Horder, J. (2004).Excusing Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horowitz, D. (1986). “Justification and Excuse in the Program of the Criminal Law”. 49 Law and Contemporary Problems 109.
Hruschka, J. (2005). “Justifictions and Excuses: A Systematic Approach”. 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 407.
Jescheck, H.-H. (1972). Lehrbuch des Strafrechts: allgemeiner Teil(2nd edition). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Jhering, R. (1867). Das Schuldmoment im romischen Privatrecht. Giessen: Roth.
Kadish, S. (1976). “Respect for Life and Regard for Rights in the Criminal Law”. 64 California Law Review 871.
Kadish, S. (1987). “Excusing Crime”. 75 California Law Review 257.
Kant, I. (1965 first published in 1797). The Metaphysical Elements of Justice (translated by J. Ladd). Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill.
Kaye, J. M. (1967). “The Early History of Murder and Manslaughter”. 83 Law Quarterly Review 365 and 569
Liszt, V. (1911). Lehrbuch des Deutschen Strafrechts. Berlin: J. Guttentag.
Matravers, M. (2000). Justice and Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, J. (1934). Handbook of Criminal Law. St. Paul: West Publishing.
Moore, M. (1985). “Causation and Excuses”. 73 California Law Review 1091.
Mousourakis, G. (1998). Criminal Responsibility and Partial Excuses. Aldershoot UK and Brookfield USA: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Nowell-Smith, P. H. (1970). “On Sanctioning Excuses”. 67 The Journal of Philosophy 609.
Omichinski, N. (1987). “Applying the Theories of Justifiable Homicide to Conflicts in the Doctrine of Self-Defence”. 33 Wayne Law Review 1447.
Pollock, F. and Maitland F. (1898). The History of English Law (2nd edition).
Robinson, P. (1975). “A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability”. 23 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 266.
Robinson, P. (1982). “Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis”. 82 Columbia Law Review 199.
Schmidhauser, (1975). Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil (2nd edition). Tübingen: Mohr.
Smith, J. C. (1989). Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law: The Hamlyn Lectures. London: Stevens and Sons.
Stephen, James Fitzjames, (1883). A History of the Criminal Law of England III. London: Macmillan.
Wasserstrom, R. (1967). “H.L.A. Hart and the Doctrines of Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility”. 35 The University of Chicago Law Review 92.
Williams, G. (1961). Criminal Law: The General Part (2nd edition). London: Stevens.
Yeo, S. (1988). “Proportionality in Criminal Defences”. 12 Criminal Law Journal 227.