The System of Selecting Candidates for Judges in the Selected Countries

Beata Stępień-Załucka

University of Rzeszow

Law and Forensic Science, Volume 17 (2019/1)

Submitted: January 21, 2019.

Abstract: The issue of the selection of judges for judicial positions seems to be an interesting dilemma of constitutional law. There are several models in the world, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. There is therefore no uniform approach by individual legislators. The author presents these systems, trying to present the broadest possible spectrum of activities of individual legislators. She presents selected regulations from countries such as the United States of America, Germany and France. The text may be an interesting point of reference for those legislators who are considering changes in this area.

Keywords: judiciary, judges, courts, candidates for judges

References

American Bar Association (2001). Standards on State Judical Selection. Chicago.

Abu Gholeh M., Bury P. (2016). Bezpośredni wybór sędziów na przykładzie Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki. In O. Hołub, M. Jabłoński, M. Radajewski (Eds.), Instytucje demokracji bezpośredniej w praktyce, Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.

Aspin L., Hall W. (2000). Thirty Years of Judical Retention Elections: An Update. Social Science Journal, No 37.

Bodensteiner I. E. (1983). The Role of Federal Judges: Their Duty to Enforce the Constitutional Rights of Individuals When the Other Branches of Government Default. Valparaiso University Law Review, No 18.

Burnham W. (2006). Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States. St. Paul: Thomson/West.

Canvit G. (2010). Au nom de qui, au nom de quoi jugent les juges? Aprés-demain, No 3.

Errera R. (2005). Recruitment, Training, Evaluation, Career and Accountability of Members of the Judiciary in France. In G. Di Federico (Ed.), Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and Spain, Bologna: Lo Scarabeo.

Errera R. (2009). Sur le Conseil supérieur de la magistrature français: réflexions et perspectives. Die Schweizer Richterzeitung, No 2.

François B. (1995). Sądownictwo konstytucyjne we Francji. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, No 2.

Fricero N. (2018). Les institutions judiciaires. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Gualino.

Friedman L. M. (2005). A History of American Law, New York: Touchstone.

Garoupa N. & Ginsburg T. (2009). Guarding the Guardians : Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence. American Journal of Comparative Law, No 57.

Godlewska-Michalak B. (2013). Model dojścia do zawodu sędziego w wybranych państwach europejskich. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa, No 2.

Grade Ch. (2014) Richter oder Söldner? Erfahrungen, Zumutungen und Desillusionierungen während eines Zeitraums von fünf Jahren als Proberichter in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Betrifft Justiz, No 120.

Katcher S. (2006). Legal Training in the United States: A Brief History. Wisconsin International Law Journal, No. 1.

Kischel U. (2014). Wybór sędziów niemieckiego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego w ujęciu porównawczym. Państwo i Prawo, No 9.

Kraśnicka I. (2016). Systemy wyborów sędziów stanowych w USA, Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, No 20A.

Müller L. (2015). Richterliche Unabhängigkeit und Unparteilichkeit nach Art. 6 EMRK – Anforderungen der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention und spezifische Probleme in den östlichen Europaratsstaaten. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

O’Connel F., Mc Caffrey R. (2012). Judicial Appointments in Germany and United States. Northern Island Assembly Research and Information Service Research Paper, No 60.

Pratt W. F. (1976). Judical Disability and the Good Behaviour Clause. Yale Law Journal, No 85.

Riedel J. (2005). Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Germany. In G. Di Federico (Ed.), Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and Spain, Bologna: Lo Scarabeo.

Rookard L. W. (2016). A Referee Without a Whistle: Magistrate Judges and Discovery Sanctions in the Seventh Circuit. Indiana Law Journal, No 91.

Ross G.W.C. (1943-44). “Good Behaviour” of Federal Judges. University of Kansas City Law Review, No 12.

Rychert M. (2012). Prawniczy American Dream. Na Wokandzie, Nr 11.

Scalia A. (1997). A Matter of Interpretation. Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Scheb J. M., Scheb J. M. II (2002). An Introduction to the American Legal System. Albany NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.

Siegel L. J., Worrall J. L. (2019). Essentials of Criminal Justice. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Stepień-Załucka B. (2019). Sędziowski stan spoczynku. Studium konstytucyjnoprawne. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

Stryczyńska E. (2008). Urząd sędziego koroną zawodów prawniczych, Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa, No 1.

Swenson K. (2006). Promotion of District Court Judges to the U.S. Courts of Appeals: Explaining President Reagan’s Promotions of His Own Appointees. Justice System Journal, No 2.

Ware S. J. (2009). The Missouri Plan in National Perspective. Missouri Law Review, No 3.

Westerland Ch. L. (2017). The Strategic Analysis of Judical Behaviour and the Separation of Powers. In L. Epstein, S. A. Lindquist (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judical Behaviour, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yoon A. (2005). As You Like It. Senior Federal Judges and the Political Economy of Judical Tenure. Journal of Empirical Studies, No 3.

Yustus E. (2013). Status und Aufgaben des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. In W. I. Fadeev, C. Schulze (Eds.), Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der Russischen Föderation und in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Postdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.

Zacher H. F. (1983). Versorgung der Beamten, Richter un Soldaten. In Darstellung der Alterssicherungssysteme und der Besteuerung von Alterseinkommen, Bonn: Bundesminister für Arbeit u. Sozialordnung.